Best In Show
philsergeant
Palm City, Florida, USA
I don't know why they advertise it as the WKC Dog Show?? If you look at the fact that even a Fru-Fru dog won the TERRIER! division they should definitely call it the GLBT show considering the judges' apparent dispositions....I mean are they judging the dogs or hair stylists???.. some of the dogs you can't even SEE! But I had to share the real winners of the competition! These two are great! (I'll probably be sued by USA network and the GLBT community)! Whatever!
IMG_2917.JPG
2048 x 1536 - 824K
IMG_2923.JPG
2048 x 1536 - 628K
In the beginning God created English Bull Terriers, in the image of EBT's, God created all other breeds.
Comments
I don't wish for anyone to misunderstand me by any means because these two Bullies you posted are gorgeous but I can't help to say I have seen many other Bull Terriers that trump these two. They may not be spending their lives going from show to show in hopes of getting an invite to the westminster dog show but they certainly require no blue ribbon from a show to recognize their qualities in all spectrum of the breed standards.
Maybe I'm just thoroughly impressed with seeing so many Bull Terriers on and off the show ring. I love them all.
"It's not just a Dog, it's a Bull Terrier!"
www.bulliesofnc.com
But I am not sure, just a guess.
and it's not considered a fault. However, White Bull Terriers should not
have any markings on their body at all except their face and ears.
Oddly though, I have seen people showing white bull terriers with
saddleback (splash) marks as though they are naive to the breed standard
definition of "Any markings elsewhere than the head are to be severely
faulted."
The confusion I think comes from AKC's definition of the breed standard.
When they describe the breed standard they describe the standards for
the "White" Bull Terrier and then go to "Colored" Bull Terriers which
only has a few differences.
"It's not just a Dog, it's a Bull Terrier!"
www.bulliesofnc.com